Prediction of Peter Fleming vs Emilio Montano Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Fleming vs E. Montano

Peter Fleming

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Emilio Montano

MEX

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Fleming 1 - 0 Montano

They have played 2 sets in total, with Peter Fleming winning 2 and Emilio Montano winning 0. The last match between Peter Fleming and Emilio Montano was at the Cincinnati, 12-07-1976, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Peter Fleming getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fleming	1
Montano	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Cincinnati(07-12-76)

Stats

Peter Fleming

Emilio Montano

P. Fleming vs E. Montano H2H Profile

P. Fleming	Stats	E. Montano
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
51.79% (231-215)	Career Total W/L	30.59% (26-59)
1	Clay	0
4	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Fleming vs E. Montano Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peter Fleming has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Emilio Montano has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peter Fleming, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emilio Montano has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Peter Fleming has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emilio Montano has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Peter Fleming has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Emilio Montano winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Peter Fleming has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 94/77), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Emilio Montano has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 10/14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 13/36).
Player level: In the last year, Peter Fleming has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Emilio Montano has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Peter Fleming winning 1 times and Emilio Montano being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Peter Fleming winning 2 and Emilio Montano winning 0.
The last match between Peter Fleming and Emilio Montano was at the Cincinnati, 12-07-1976, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Peter Fleming getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peter Fleming has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Emilio Montano has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peter Fleming has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emilio Montano has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Peter Fleming has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emilio Montano has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Peter Fleming vs Emilio Montano Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Fleming vs E. Montano H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Fleming	Stats	E. Montano
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Fleming Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wembley - 10-11-1987
R3 Alexander VolkovA. Volkov	L	6-2 4-6 6-2	Stats
Stockholm - 02-11-1987
R2 Sergio CasalS. Casal	L	6-3 6-7 6-1	Stats
Bergen CH - 26-10-1987
R4 Grant ConnellG. Connell	L	6-4 3-6 6-1	Stats
R3 Claudio PanattaC. Panatta	W	7-6 6-2	Stats
San Francisco - 28-09-1987
R3 Woody HuntW. Hunt	L	7-5 6-4	Stats

View All

E. Montano Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Mexico City - 23-02-1981
R3 Paul KronkP. Kronk	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
San Juan - 19-01-1981
R3 George HardieG. Hardie	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Tokyo Outdoor - 20-10-1980
R2 Bruce KleegeB. Kleege	L	6-1 7-6	Stats
Republic Of China - 13-10-1980
R3 Louk SandersL. Sanders	W	6-2 1-6 6-2	Stats
R4 Cliff LetcherC. Letcher	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

P. Fleming vs E. Montano Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Fleming	Stats	E. Montano
51.80% (230/214)	YTD Win/Loss	30.95% (26/58)
52.01% (581/536)	Sets Win/Loss	34.67% (69/130)
50.88% (5498/5307)	Games Win/Loss	44.03% (808/1027)
54.97% (94/77)	Hard Win/Loss	41.67% (10/14)
38.60% (22/35)	Clay Win/Loss	26.53% (13/36)
56.47% (96/74)	Indoor Hard W/L	25.00% (1/3)
40.00% (18/27)	Grass Win/Loss	28.57% (2/5)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
557.08	Average Opponent Rank	582.86
46.00% (23/27)	Slam W/L	20.00% (1/4)
52.78% (19/17)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/3)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	50.00% (2/2)
51.85% (182/169)	Main Tour W/L	30.00% (18/42)
85.71% (6/1)	Challenger W/L	41.67% (5/7)
53% (209/397)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	29% (22/75)
43% (19/44)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (4/8)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
46% (73/159)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (9/20)
81% (240/194)	1st Set Won, Won Match	76% (29/22)
19% (240/46)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	24% (29/7)
18% (204/36)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	7% (54/4)